Inrico S200 vs Inrico T320
Add more devices to this comparison
Key differences
- Ingress protection: IP54 on the Inrico S200, IP65 on the Inrico T320.
- The Inrico S200 has the bigger battery: 3800 mAh against 3500 mAh (+9%).
- The Inrico T320 is heavier: 257 g against 210 g (+22%).
- Countries with a type approval on record: 7 for the Inrico S200, 5 for the Inrico T320 (5 in common).
- Both work with iConvNet.
| Inrico S200 | Inrico T320 | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Brand | Inrico | Inrico |
| Model | S200 | T320 |
| Type | Handheld PoC radio | Handheld PoC radio |
| Status | Available | Available |
| Release year | — | — |
| Approved in | ||
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | Android |
| OS version | 10 | 8.1 |
| Chipset | MediaTek MT6739 | MediaTek MT6739 |
| RAM | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Storage | 32 GB | 8 GB |
| Network | ||
| Networks | 2G, 3G, 4G | 2G, 3G, 4G |
| LTE bands | B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B39/B40/B41 | B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B39/B40/B41 |
| Wi-Fi | IEEE 802.11 a/b/g/n (2.4G & 5G) | 802.11 b/g/n (2.4G & 5G) |
| Bluetooth | 4.0 + BLE | 4.0 + BLE |
| GNSS | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Push-to-talk | ||
| Dedicated PTT key | No | Yes |
| Programmable keys | — | — |
| PoC apps | iConvNet | Zello, iConvNet |
| 3GPP MCPTT | — | — |
| Analog/DMR hybrid | — | — |
| Physical | ||
| IP rating | IP54 | IP65 |
| MIL-STD | — | — |
| ATEX | — | — |
| Display | 3.1″, touch | 2.4″, touch |
| Battery | 3800 mAh | 3500 mAh |
| Weight | 210 g | 257 g |
| Dimensions | 128.0 x 57.0 x 24.5 mm (without antenna and belt clip) | 140 x 64 x 28 mm (without antenna and belt clip) |
| Speaker | 2 W | 2 W |
| Camera | 13 MP rear, 2 MP front | 8 MP rear, 2 MP front |