Inrico S200 vs Inrico TM-9
Add more devices to this comparison
Key differences
- The Inrico TM-9 is heavier: 500 g against 210 g (+138%).
- Countries with a type approval on record: 7 for the Inrico S200, 5 for the Inrico TM-9 (4 in common).
| Inrico S200 | Inrico TM-9 | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Brand | Inrico | Inrico |
| Model | S200 | TM-9 |
| Type | Handheld PoC radio | Vehicle terminal |
| Status | Available | Available |
| Release year | — | — |
| Approved in |  Canada,  China,  Colombia,  European Union,  Mexico,  United Kingdom*,  United States |  Brazil, Colombia, European Union, United Kingdom*, United States |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | Android |
| OS version | 10 | 7.1 |
| Chipset | MediaTek MT6739 | MediaTek MT6739 |
| RAM | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Storage | 32 GB | 8 GB |
| Network | ||
| Networks | 2G, 3G, 4G | 2G, 3G, 4G |
| LTE bands | B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B39/B40/B41 | B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41 |
| Wi-Fi | IEEE 802.11 a/b/g/n (2.4G & 5G) | IEEE 802.11 a/b/g/n (2.4G & 5G) |
| Bluetooth | 4.0 + BLE | 4.0 |
| GNSS | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Push-to-talk | ||
| Dedicated PTT key | No | — |
| Programmable keys | — | — |
| PoC apps | iConvNet | — |
| 3GPP MCPTT | — | — |
| Analog/DMR hybrid | — | — |
| Physical | ||
| IP rating | IP54 | IP54 |
| MIL-STD | — | — |
| ATEX | — | — |
| Display | 3.1″, touch | 4″, touch |
| Battery | 3800 mAh | — |
| Weight | 210 g | 500 g |
| Dimensions | 128.0 x 57.0 x 24.5 mm (without antenna and belt clip) | 195.1 x 67.3 x 88.6 mm |
| Speaker | 2 W | 5 W |
| Camera | 13 MP rear, 2 MP front | — |